[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Travis Zadikem" <tzadikem at picosecond dot com>
 To:  "'Josh McAllister'" <josh at bluehornet dot com>, "'Robert Staph'" <rstaph at digitalimpreza dot com>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] PLEASE MARK THIS AS A BUG!!!... Problems using multiple IP addresses on m0n0wall
 Date:  Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:58:54 -0700
FreeBSDism.  That doesn't appear to be a problem with IPCOP.  I was making a
point that if you are going to put an alias field into a web interface that
doesn't work correctly then why put it into there.  I have the m0n0wall book
and this is not something that is in there as an issue.  It's not that I
don't "get it" its the idea of having something that works correctly free
and/or not free.  I just searched thru some archives and see that this has
come up before, but has never been put in as a bug to get fixed.  Well, I am
asking that this be put in a something to get fixed.  There is nothing more
frustrating then asking (if you check back a few months) about the alias in
m0n0wall and no one saying that you had to run the extra command to fix it,
but that it does "WORK!!"

-----Original Message-----
From: Josh McAllister [mailto:josh at bluehornet dot com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:44 AM
To: Travis Zadikem; Robert Staph; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] PLEASE MARK THIS AS A BUG!!!... Problems using
multiple IP addresses on m0n0wall


Nice rant... by all means, feel free to dump m0n0 and pay for a
commercial product simply because you don't get it. 

It's NOT a bug, it's a FreeBSD-ism.

http://www.daemonnews.org/199911/answerman.html#alias_netmask

Relax!

Josh McAllister

-----Original Message-----
From: Travis Zadikem [mailto:tzadikem at picosecond dot com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:31 AM
To: 'Robert Staph'; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: [m0n0wall] PLEASE MARK THIS AS A BUG!!!... Problems using
multiple IP addresses on m0n0wall
Importance: High

You have got to be kidding!!? This worked.  Why in the world does the
interface
not work right with this?  It is things like this that just really make
an
IT Admin
want to use commercial and/or other products.  I really really
appreciate
your help
and would like to get this put in as BUG and also fixed ASAP.  We do
development here
and the philosophy is if it doesn't work then don't put it in and/or
make it
an option until it is tested and works.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Staph [mailto:rstaph at digitalimpreza dot com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 9:08 AM
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Problems using multiple IP addresses on m0n0wall


you'll need to use netmask of 255.255.255.255 and enter one alias for
each
external IP.

-Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Travis Zadikem" <tzadikem at picosecond dot com>
To: <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:53 AM
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Problems using multiple IP addresses on m0n0wall


> Here is my status.php
> xl2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> options=1<RXCSUM>
> inet 64.207.38.2 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 64.207.38.15
> ether 00:50:da:d6:56:95
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
> status: active
>
> so I ran the following on the exec.php page:
> /sbin/ifconfig xl2 64.207.38.4 netmask 0xfffffff0 alias
>
> and got the following:
> $ /sbin/ifconfig xl2 64.207.38.4 netmask 0xfffffff0 alias
> ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Staph [mailto:rstaph at digitalimpreza dot com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:16 AM
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Problems using multiple IP addresses on
m0n0wall
>
>
> goto your-mono-ip/status.php and look in the "interfaces" section and
make
> sure its aliased the other external IPs on the WAN interface.  I'm
> guessing
> you're using the generic-pc m0n0wall image?
>
> example from my config:
>
> bge0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
> options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM>
> inet x.y.z.202 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast x.y.z.207
> inet x.y.z.203 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.z.203
> inet x.y.z.204 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.z.204
> inet x.y.z.205 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.z.205
> inet x.y.z.206 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast x.y.z.206
> ether 00:10:18:0b:68:91
> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
> status: active
>
> if you don't have more than just one line here, goto
your-mono-ip/exec.php
> and enter:
>
> /sbin/ifconfig bge0 x.y.z.a netmask 255.255.255.255 alias
>
> (replacing the bge0 with your WAN interface name and the x.y.z.a with
one
> of
> your external IPs that isn't working)
>
>
>
> Now if everything works fine with that IP address, the fix is to edit
your
> conifg.xml by hand and to add something like:
>
> <shellcmd>/sbin/ifconfig bge0 x.y.z.a netmask 255.255.255.255
> alias</shellcmd>
>
> (again, replacing the bge0 with your WAN interface name and the
x.y.z.a
> with
> one of your external IPs.  repeat as needed and make sure to place
these
> <shellcmd></shellcmd> lines somewhere in the <system></system> area.
>
> -Rob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Travis Zadikem" <tzadikem at picosecond dot com>
> To: "Monowall (E-mail)" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:01 AM
> Subject: [m0n0wall] Problems using multiple IP addresses on m0n0wall
>
>
>> Can someone please tell me why m0n0wall 1.11 is having problems with
my
>> multiple IP addresses?
>> I have DNS setup with 2 IP address (64.207.38.4 and 64.207.38.2)  My
main
>> WAN IP address on our firewall
>> is 64.207.38.2
>> In the aliases on the firewall I have the following:
>> mail  64.207.38.4  Mail1
>> web  64.207.38.2   Mail2
>>
>> My NAT has the following:
>>
>> WAN  TCP  25 (SMTP)  192.168.1.160
>> (ext.: 64.207.38.4)  25 (SMTP)  SMTP to Mail2
>> WAN  TCP  25 (SMTP)  192.168.1.55  25 (SMTP)
>> WAN  TCP  80 (HTTP)  192.168.1.160  80 (HTTP)
>> WAN  TCP  110 (POP3)  192.168.1.55  110 (POP3)
>> WAN  TCP  443 (HTTPS)  192.168.1.160  443 (HTTPS)  Webmail on new
mail
>> server
>> WAN  TCP/UDP  143 (IMAP)  192.168.1.55  143 (IMAP)
>>
>> Externally I can telnet to port 25 of 64.207.38.2 and it works just
fine.
>> I
>> can
>> not telnet to port 25 of 64.207.38.4 or port 110 or port 143 but I
can
>> from
>> inside the firewall.  What appears to be the problem??
>>
>> Travis
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch