[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Dave Warren" <MailList at devilsplayground dot net>
 To:  "Daniel L. Hunter" <dhunter at TechMethods dot com>, "Chris Buechler" <cbuechler at gmail dot com>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] DHCP Weirdness
 Date:  Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:01:01 -0700
> Isn't there a more elegant way to implement Proxy ARP?  Why can't an 
> entry be added in the Proxy ARP table automatically when a Server NAT 
> entry is added (like adding a new rule automatically when adding an 
> inbound NAT rule)?  For a networking novice like me, it sure would have
> been nice for this to be a little more idiot-proof.

What about people that don't need Proxy ARP?  Depending on your
configuration it's not always required, and the documentation is pretty
explicit that Proxy ARP is usually required.