[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
 To:  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathias_Bur=E9n?= <mathias dot buren at gmail dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] let traffic in to m0n0wall?
 Date:  Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:03:09 -0500
<mathias dot buren at gmail dot com> wrote:
> Nothing with port 113 is NAT:ed.
> Under firewall > rules > wan:
> 
>  TCP/UDP         *       113     *       113     let in port 113
> 

Source port should be any not 113.

-Chris