|
||||||||
Jesse spake: > I tend to agree with this. I had a Soekris 4801 riding a > saturated T1 in bridge mode doing traffic shaping for about a > week. The webGUI was painfully slow, but the Soekris seemed > to handle the traffic quite well. > > I wouldn't place a Soekris 4801 on anything larger than a > saturated T1 though. Don't the benchmarks show a 4801 capable of routing 20-30mbit/sec (without VPN) though? My home connection isn't very busy, but I get the throughput I'd expect out of it... 3mbit/256kbit cable with Adelphia. http://www.dslreports.com/speedtests/2783131;243368;54f933b4d2433bdee490 b28ca5f986b1;2.0;chi.speakeasy.net/1109279054 I'm using shaping/queuing, but not much else. Net4801 and m0n0 1.2b3. CPU is rarely over 25-30%. Supposedly a pentium 200 with decent NICs is able to route a 100mbit line under GNU. Is the FreeBSD routing code that bad, or is there really that much of a hit from firewalling and shaping? --Braden |