On Thursday 24 February 2005 3:46 pm, Manuel Kasper wrote:
> On 24.02.2005 13:56 -0500, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> > That's a neat idea. Lots of advantages! webGUI wouldn't even have to
> > run on the m0n0wall.
> > Do you think you'd still use PHP for the server component?
> No way! ;) That's something that PHP definitely doesn't work for
> (well of course it would somehow, but that would be completely
> against the intention with which PHP was made). I was more thinking
> of using a small JVM and implementing the server component in Java.
> However, I haven't actually evaluated any small/embedded JVMs to see
> how fast and reliable they are.
:) That's what I thought! OCaml has been described as a "Java Killer",
just as m0n0wall has been described as a "Smoothwall Killer". :) OCaml
contains it's own garbage collector and everything.
I think you may have just made a case for an OCaml m0n0wall port. Now
the question is: Will Jesse ever get around to actually writing it? :)
To be continued...
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)