[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Norman H. Azadian" <norman at azadian dot ch>
 To:  Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] azureus problem?
 Date:  Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:51:09 +0100
Yeah, I'm seeing lots of dropped packets.  For example:

   	08:42:58.717542  	LAN  	192.168.3.10, port 37136  	67.122.163.158, port 
6883  	TCP
	08:42:58.380437 	WAN 	209.183.217.75, port 10414 	80.238.228.22, port 
33448 	UDP
	08:42:55.338442 	LAN 	192.168.3.10, port 37136 	67.122.163.158, port 6883 	TCP
	08:42:53.712726 	WAN 	209.183.217.75, port 10414 	80.238.228.22, port 
33448 	UDP
	08:42:48.719304 	WAN 	209.183.217.75, port 10414 	80.238.228.22, port 
33448 	UDP
	08:42:43.705816 	WAN 	209.183.217.75, port 10414 	80.238.228.22, port 
33448 	UDP
	08:42:39.395738 	WAN 	209.183.217.75, port 10414 	80.238.228.22, port 
33448 	UDP
	08:42:28.014150 	WAN 	84.217.62.107, port 64409 	192.168.3.10, port 49999 	TCP
	08:41:52.884339 	LAN 	192.168.3.10, port 37149 	69.178.97.13, port 6883 	TCP


Here's my NAT config:

WAN  	TCP  	 	22 (SSH)  	WS  	22 (SSH)  	SSH   	
WAN 	TCP 		80 (HTTP) 	web 	80 (HTTP) 	web server
WAN 	TCP 		110 (POP3) 	email 	110 (POP3) 	POP3  	
WAN 	TCP 		465 		email 	465 		SMTP SSL
WAN 	TCP 		995 		email 	995 		POP3 SSL
WAN 	TCP/UDP 	25 (SMTP) 	email 	25 (SMTP) 	SMTP  	
WAN 	TCP/UDP 	143 (IMAP) 	email 	143 (IMAP) 	IMAP  	
WAN 	TCP/UDP 	993 		email 	993 		IMAP SSL
WAN 	TCP/UDP 	49999 		BT 	49999 		Bit Torrent
WAN 	UDP 		5060 		192.168.2.11 	5060 	VoIP  	


I think I'm doing something stupid here.

NHA
---
Norman H. Azadian    Taegerishalde 13    CH-3110 Muensingen    Switzerland
norman at azadian dot ch      tel: +41 31 721 7855      fax: +41 31 55 898 55


Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:13:22 +0100, Norman H. Azadian <norman at azadian dot ch> wrote:
> 
>>If port 6969 has to be forwarded for BT, then how come the NAT wizard
>>doesn't include a rule for it?  Besides that, how is it possible that I'm
>>running more-or-less OK now without that port?
>>
> 
> 
> 6969 is outbound only, unless you run the tracker yourself.  
> 
> Inbound you should only need 6881-6889, or 6881-6999 (the former
> should suffice).
> 
> With those NAT'ed are you seeing dropped traffic?  
> 
> -Chris
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>