On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:57:05 -0500, Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:47:42 +0000, Alex Pimperton <alex at erus dot co dot uk> wrote:
> > The packets that are dropped are all part of one protocol (dc++), yet
> > the packets being dropped don't seem to affect the transfer speed or
> > reliability of the application.
> Sounds like this (and p2p is known to make this happen more because it
> uses so many packets).
> That wouldn't be why it's dropping legit sessions though. I don't
> know on that.
I should re-word that. Not that the others weren't legit, I meant
dropping sessions it shouldn't because they're still active (RHN),
where as the P2P dropped traffic is "normal" IPFilter behavior.