Re: [m0n0wall] IPSEC tunnel and multiple subnets

From:	Jeroen Geusebroek <j dot geusebroek at gmail dot com>
To:	Braden McGrath <braden at mcmail dot homeip dot net>
Cc:	m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject:	Re: [m0n0wall] IPSEC tunnel and multiple subnets
Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:56:55 +0100

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:02:11 -0500, Braden McGrath
<braden at mcmail dot homeip dot net> wrote:

> I think you need to set the static route on 10.9.1.254, telling it that
> all traffic for 192.168.1.0/24 goes through 10.9.1.18.
> 
> It's not .2.254's job to route "past" its next peer - if you tell it to
> route traffic (via IPSEC) to the other end of the tunnel, the router at
> the other end needs to know where to send the traffic for
> 192.168.1.0/24.

Sure that sounds logical; but how does the 2.254 (m0n0) peer know that it should
route 192.168.1.0 traffic through the tunnel? AFAIK there is no way to configure
that (at least using the GUI).

--- 
Jeroen