I'm running 1.11 on the latest WRAP, and I'm getting more like 30% lossage. 
    Azureus is continuously pumping about 100KByte/sec through it to my 
1200/200 ADSL, but all load averages are 0.00.

NHA
---
Norman H. Azadian    Taegerishalde 13    CH-3110 Muensingen    Switzerland
norman at azadian dot ch      tel: +41 31 721 7855      fax: +41 31 55 898 55


Bryan Marc Schaubach wrote:
> Well, my brother runs version 1.11 on his 4xx mhz machine with 64mb of
> ram and he also reported 20% packet loss.. so to answer your question..
> yes, at least in these two cases .. but my brother's computer is awfully
> slow (I think 433 or 466mhz) .. so his might actually be as a result of
> the computer itself.. but his is pentium class, not 486.
> 
> Sorry I cannot help you further.. if you have a 1.11 system available, I
> would be interested in knowing if this happens to you too.
> 
> -Bryan
> 
> 
> Michael Iedema wrote:
> 
> 
>>>With that said, I have had a good relationship with the ease and
>>>functionality of m0n0wall.  So from there, I have been using the beta's
>>>up until 1.2b5 .. when I upgraded to b6 my computer would give a seg
>>>fault on loading -- I guess my celeron 933 was just too outdated for
>>>it?? oh well.. not to worry, I liked b5.. it worked great until....
>>
>>
>>Did the same thing happen with a release version?  Up until the 5.x
>>switch the beta's were almost always rock solid.  It was stated on the
>>list that these would be rough.  I'm just wondering if you could
>>reproduce any of these problems on a release version.
>>
>>You obviously had different needs than m0n0wall could deliver.  That's
>>OK, I'm just wondering if this is anything that the team should be
>>looking at.
>>
>>--Michael I.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>