[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Braden McGrath" <braden at mcmail dot homeip dot net>
 To:  "Chris Buechler" <cbuechler at gmail dot com>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] 1.2b7 lockups on Soekris 48xx
 Date:  Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:35:24 -0500
Interestingly, I am not able to duplicate the pegged CPU on b5+ with my
4801.  It gets kind of high (40ish % during 3mbit down and ~5kbit up)
but it's not at 100% the way others have described.

Also, after having moved back to b6 for a while, I went to b7 again and
mine is no longer locking up.  I can't think of any logical reasons for
this though... 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuechler at gmail dot com] 
> Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 12:09 PM
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] 1.2b7 lockups on Soekris 48xx
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:41:58 +0200, Frederick Page 
> <fpage at thebetteros dot oche dot de> wrote:
> > 
> > >>Might be indeed a temperature issue, the Bios freezes the machine 
> > >>according to docs, when temperature gets too high. Maybe 
> the sensor 
> > >>is off in some machines.
> > 
> > >One of the early things I plan to make run is the watchdog.  (At 
> > >least, I haven't seen any evidence of it being
> > >enabled.)
> > 
> > That sounds like a good idea. However, if those freezes should be 
> > because the BIOS of the WRAP (mistakenly) believes the 
> temperature is 
> > too high and freezes the machine, I doubt the watchdog will 
> be able to 
> > react (when complete machine is frozen by BIOS).
> > 
> > I now have the WRAP running like hell, with no problems whatsoever, 
> > the temperature theory seems to be it. Maybe a sensor is 
> off and gives 
> > wrong readings? I am very glad that my WRAP does not freeze anymore.
> > 
> Given the problem discovered over the weekend with much 
> higher CPU utilization on b5+, which of course would generate 
> more heat from the CPU, this makes sense.  I don't think it 
> should be getting hot enough to freeze up the WRAP though, 
> unless it has a design flaw that it can't run at higher CPU 
> utilization for very long.
> As far as the watchdog, it used to be enabled and was taken 
> out long ago because it caused problems more than it helped.  
> It unnecessarily caused reboots, possibly amongst other 
> problems, but check the archives if you want to look at it further.
> http://www.google.com/search?q=watchdog+site%3Am0n0%2Ech
> -Chris
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch