Kevin Bowling schrieb am 31. March 2005:
>Interestingly enough, I am not experiencing the slowdowns users like
This is indeed interesting, the WebUI alone is noticeably slower in
1.2b6 than it was in 1.2b3 (WRAP 1C, Bios 1.03, 266 Mhz, 128 MB RAM).
>I am able to pull my entire 4 megabit line down with minimal effort
>on the firewall.
I can do that too, I also have 4 mBit total bandwidth and CPU is at
about 50% (many firewall rules, some NATting).
>Granted, 5.3 uses a bit more CPU but nothing too absurd.
CPU is at 50% with 1.2b6, I experience no immediate problems either,
but it's almost double of what 1.2b3 would utilize with exactly the
same functionality. And the WebUI is noticeably slower here on 1.2b6
>The test was run using two client PCs: one running Azureus and an
>HTTP download from IBM, and the other running eXeem for a total of
>maybe 80 or so streams.
That's about the scenario I am running here.
>CPU use was in the low 20 percentiles regardless of the HTTP download
>running or not.
This indeed is interesting. There might be differences between your PC
and my WRAP.
>IIRC I believe the 4.3 release tree would run around 10-15% in
So you also experienced an almost double CPU utilization. That was my
point: this almost 100% increase is IMHO alarming.
Kind regards Frederick