[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  woofz at gmx dot net
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] wallwatcher
 Date:  Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:05:45 +0800
Greeting from Singapore.

& not forgeting WallWatcher support on http:\\www.myNetWatchman.com
intrusion reporting systems which i currently running on v1.2b7 :)


On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:01:41 -0400, you wrote:

>My initial thoughts about WallWatcher (WW).
>1. I installed two relatively small files on a windows XP workstation.
>The instructions for setup are pretty clear. The help documentation is
>pretty extensive. I found the install to be pretty easy.
>2. Setup..again pretty easy, as long as you remember to disable the
>current syslogd running on the system :) AND very flexible with
>respect to displays, alerts, what's logged...etc.
>3. Alerts in the log capture screen can be sorted on the fly simply by
>clicking the column header. I reports Inbound, Outbound, IP, FQDN,
>4. Reporting can generate graphical reports by many different
>values...IP, WAN, LAN, Port.
>5. WW can use SNMP for Bandwidth Useage reporting. The capture rate
>can be set at whatever interval you need. WW can also generate a
>graphical report for bandwidth useage.
>To go on would be to reproduce the help file. There's tons more
>features. I spent about an hour playing with WW. I like it and I plan
>to continue using it. If what you need is firewall logging and
>reporting AND it needs to be easy and cheap, WW is worth looking into.
>It's just my opinion, but I think it should be added to the docbook
>section 10.7 logging
>The one nice thing that KIWI does, that WW does not do is report the
>Filter rule (@17, @3...etc)
>btw...This was tested using m0n0wall v 1.11, for a small office. WW
>was loaded on a windows XP box. Our interent connection is froma
>fractional T-1.
>- Don