|
||||||||||
Is that C3 a Nehemia-Core? If so this one has the Padlock-Feature which means that it does a kickass-performance on ipsec: http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/hardware.jsp (look at the bottom of the page for the comparison on encryption between C3 and P4 ;-) I don't know if m0n0 supports padlock though, maybe someone who knows the m0n0 more "inside" can tell you. You can optimize IPSEC-Performance by using a faster encryption-method too. I have two C3 Nehemia at home and might do some testing this evening to tell you what the throughput is with a freebsd 5.4RC platform that does use padlock. Don't forget, that the other end of the tunnel has to do encryption too, so it is not only an issue of the encryption speed of the mainlocation. Regards, Holger Bauer -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: sai [mailto:sonicsai at gmail dot com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. April 2005 14:58 An: Chris Buechler Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch Betreff: Re: [m0n0wall] Limit of VPN Clients > PPTP is 16, but...http://chrisbuechler.com/index.php?id=19 > > I believe IPsec and OpenVPN don't have a hard limit less than how much > your hardware can handle. > > -Chris > How many tunnels can a VIA C3 900MHz handle? I have 1 main location and want to set up tunnels to connect 3 remote locations - could a 900MHz processor handle this? Each location has intermittent traffic, with a peak of 200kbps. sai --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch ____________ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit |