It depends on which Asterisk package you're using - I'm actually using AstLinux, which also works on
the net4801 and does everything off of compact flash - very cool.  What it does lack is the simple
UI for managing NAT rules, etc.  Ultimately I may end up running AstLinux on the Soekris instead of
Mono, but I'd rather find out why a $60 DLink box can do it and Mono can't.  Normally Mono is my
generic recommendation for higher performance router, but I think more and more people will be doing
SIP in the future, so I'd like to see this at least identified and hopefully even resolved.

 --- On Thu 04/28, Adrian Basescu < adrianeli at gmail dot com > wrote:
From: Adrian Basescu [mailto: adrianeli at gmail dot com]
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:31:37 -0400
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Problem with multiple SIP devices behind Mono

A local Asterisk server for just a few SIP devices is overkill in my <br>opinion, unless you have
lots of SIP devices to connect.<br><br>My workaround is running siproxd on my M0n0wall box and
configure my SIP <br>devices or programs to use <br>my M0n0 as an Outbound proxy. <br>This fixed
some other problems with my SIP devices, since a STUN server <br>configuration in SIP does not
work<br>well with M0n0.<br><br>-- <br>Adrian<br>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!