On May 6, 2005, at 6:58 AM, Michael Sierchio wrote:

> Chris Buechler wrote:
>
>> Manuel has stated in the past he doesn't feel a dynamic routing
>> protocol belongs on a firewall, so it doesn't sound like we'll see
>> that.  That's subject to change, of course.
>
> Given that the reference implementation is a Soekris box with 64MB
> of RAM and 0MB of swap,  managing routing tables is definitely not
> appropriate.

Why not?  In the great scheme of things, 64MB of memory is quite a bit, 
unless you're
talking about taking a full BGP feed from your provider.  Anyone who 
tries that on a Soekris
probably gets what they deserve.

Jim