On 5/4/05, Carlos Rosário <carlos dot rosario at netcabo dot pt> wrote:
> Every board will have 2 CM9, one working in Access Point mode
> and the other one in Client Mode.
> Will m0n0wall be appropriate for this?
We do this in our community wireless project (e.g. see
http://socalfreenet.org/node/520 - both those boxes are running m0n0wall
with two wireless cards: one CM9 for an 802.11a backhaul client, the
other a Senao 2511MP+ (prism-based) as an AP.
And we're gradually converting other nodes to run this same setup (from
www.nycwireless.org/pebble) for the sheer convenience of managing,
Stability so far has been excellent. We've had no more problems with the
1.2b7 builds than the earlier FreeBSD 4.7-based releases -- and we now
do a lot more with them because of the Atheros 802.11a support (e.g.
node-level bandwidth shaping, full snmp reporting, some PPTP configs).
The only fly in the ointment is the lurking 802.11b 'powersave mode' bug
Whether this is a factor in the real world or not for our installations
we don't know. Of the five busy APs we have running m0n0wall, one of the
newest has locked up twice this month. But that could be a hardware
problem. The others have been rock solid. So.... YMMV. Also, running
dual CM9 cards might avoid this completely anyway - I *think* the
powersave mode bug only applies to prism (and possibly Orinoco)-based
chipsets. (Jim, do you know?)
Hope this helped more than it confused!