|
||||||||||
Now if only 00:FE:ED:C0:ED:BA:BE:BE:EF was a valid mac address.... One could have some fun :) -----Original Message----- From: Claude Morin [mailto:klodefactor at gmail dot com] Sent: Wednesday, 11 May 2005 11:41 a.m. To: Andrew Cotter Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall on Nokia I have m0n0wall 1.2b7 running on that exact hardware (RL50/IP330) without any problems. Just use the normal PC m0n0wall image, and be aware that you'll have to hard code MAC addresses for each of the thee interfaces; the procedure is described elsewhere. You can just make up MACs, as long as they're unique within the network to which each NIC is connected. I wanted to use the real MAC addrs (for the sake of purity :-), so I used the factory-installed software image, booted to the BOOTMGR prompt, and typed "sysinfo" to see the real MACs of each interface. BTW, I the image I used is "IPSO-3.2.1-fcs1-11.24.1999-102644-849.tgz", available from driverguide.com <http://driverguide.com>. -klode On 5/10/05, Andrew Cotter <andrew dot cotter at somersetcapital dot com> wrote: > > I have 2 IP2330 units just sitting on my shelf waiting to be played > with.... > > They uesd to be checkpoint firewalls labeled as RL50. > > If I get some time... I'll let you know how it goes. > > Andrew > > -----Original Message----- > From: courtney dot harding at direcway dot com > [mailto:courtney dot harding at direcway dot com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 6:09 PM > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Cc: josh at beepmusic dot com > Subject: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall on Nokia > > I am looking at what m0n0wall I should run on a Nokia 100 Series, I > see in the Gallery it has been done. net45xx or net48xx or other? > > Also has anyone tried running it on a Nokia 200 or higher Series > Equipment? > > Thanks > Courtney > |