[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Quark IT - Hilton Travis" <Hilton at quarkit dot com dot au>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Monowall , Firewall Full-State ??
 Date:  Mon, 30 May 2005 20:42:20 +1000
Hi Chris,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuechler at gmail dot com] 
> Sent: Monday, 30 May 2005 10:06
> On 5/29/05, Nans Delrieu <delrieu dot nans at laposte dot net> wrote:
> > Hello
> > I would like to know if monowall has a firewall full-state
> It's stateful on all rules, but that's not what you're asking.  
> > For example, is it possible to use protocol like H323 ?? 
> > the port used are dynamic and is the FW is able to support 
> > this ?
> NAT-unfriendly protocols like H.323 generally aren't very well
> supported since there aren't many ALG's (application layer gateways)
> in m0n0wall, though I don't know specifically about H.323.

Speaking of Application level firewalling, is there any chance that you
can see m0n0wall heading down this road?  I'll also (obviously) ask the
same question of Manuel.  :)



Hilton Travis                          Phone: +61 (0)7 3344 3889
(Brisbane, Australia)                  Phone: +61 (0)419 792 394
Manager, Quark IT                      http://www.quarkit.com.au
         Quark AudioVisual             http://www.quarkav.net

http://www.threatcode.com/ <-- its now time to shame poor coders 
into writing code that is acceptable for use on today's networks

War doesn't determine who is right.  War determines who is left.

This document and any attachments are for the intended recipient 
  only.  It may contain confidential, privileged or copyright 
     material which must not be disclosed or distributed.