On 11.12.2003, at 22:48, Kevin Roosdahl wrote:
> When I first tried to find m0n0wall, I kept hoping it would be
> or something similar (.org, .net). Now I at least know to go to
> http://m0n0.ch. I checked into the m0n0wall names and they were
Well, at least http://m0n0.ch/wall is the first hit that turns up in
Google if you search for "m0n0wall". And we have m0n0.com too.
> (err.. borrowed?) by realcheapnames.com. I asked them what the going
> to get them back, and it is $450. I was hoping it would be reasonable
> enough that I could get it as a thanks for making such great software,
> alas that is too steep for a Christmas present. That price includes
> all of
I'd never ever buy domains from a company like that - it only
encourages them to continue doing what they do. If you really want to
buy a name, consider m0n0wall.ch. ;) I know, most people probably
wouldn't think of typing .ch instead of .com...
> People shouldn't be allowed to take names that are so obviously not
> After the free advertising on techtv - maybe the program should be
> to m0m0wall (typo on their website).
There's actually a story about the "m0n0" on what is becoming the
m0n0wall documentation project (http://m0n0.ch/wall/docs/book/view/1).