[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Phil <xphilz at gmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] 1.2b8.....bummer
 Date:  Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:47:01 +1000
Cool,

Thanks for the info. I must have overlooked the email from Manuel, but
its interesting to hear everyones comments about poor performance. I
personally have not had a bad exp with b7, but obviously a lot of
people are. Also good to know that Manuel will scrutinise BSD 5.4 b4
releasing it.

=))

On 6/2/05, Paul Rae <PRae at aminocom dot com> wrote:
> less than 4.11 on lots of hardware
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Thompson [mailto:jim at netgate dot com]
> Sent: 01 June 2005 13:44
> To: Vincent Fleuranceau
> Cc: Phil; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] 1.2b8.....bummer
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 1, 2005, at 2:33 AM, Vincent Fleuranceau wrote:
> 
> >> I may have missed the thread, but what is the technical reason for
> >> going back to 4.11?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > AFAIK, mainly because of poor network performance with FreeBSD 5.x
> > series.
> 
> 'poor' or "less than 4.11 on some hardware"?
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
>