|
||||||||||
"After boot, it's all the same." I love that about m0n0. Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Buechler" <cbuechler at gmail dot com> Cc: <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 9:14 AM Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Is it possible to install monowall on a pc ?? > On 6/2/05, Erik Anderson <erikerik at gmail dot com> wrote: >> On 6/2/05, Paul Rae <PRae at aminocom dot com> wrote: >> > There is no performance degradation from using a cd - when it boots up, >> > its all loaded into >> > memory anyway. >> >> I guess the only performance issue I could see is if the system was >> starved for RAM after loading m0n0wall. I'd guess that's not going to >> be an issue, though, with the system Nans specified. >> > > All the images load into RAM at boot. That's why 64 MB is the minimum > required (with breathing room for upgrades which also get loaded into > RAM on top of that). > > The only difference at all in speed between CD, HD, CF, Zip drive, or > whatever you boot off of is the boot speed. CD, Zip, CF, etc. are > going to be slower booting than a HD (by varying amounts). After > boot, it's all the same. > > -Chris > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > |