[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Jim Thompson <jim at netgate dot com>
 To:  "Christian Oswald" <coswald at dls dot net>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Running m0n0wall behind existing router
 Date:  Thu, 2 Jun 2005 05:25:07 -1000
On Jun 2, 2005, at 4:29 AM, Christian Oswald wrote:

> Not true, you can't put mono on a T1, that's one reason for a cisco
> router and mono together.

If this is true, it can't take very long to put a T1 card into a  
PeeCee and get the drivers up and going.
Might be a nice thing to add to pfSsense, since:

> Mono can't do half the routing a cisco router is able to do,

> can't have multiple WAN connections,
pfSense can
> fail over
pfSense can

> etc. On
> that same page, a cisco router can't function as a firewall as well  
> as a
> cisco can. So yes, mono and cisco router make a good team.
>
> Cheers,
>
> christian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Niklas Petersen [mailto:niklas at vestermarken dot net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 4:17 AM
> To: Andrej Fercic
> Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Running m0n0wall behind existing router
>
> Andrej Fercic wrote:
>
>> Niklas, I am confused. Why you want to Cisco and m0n0 together. Use
>>
> one or
>
>> another. M0n0 has all functions as Cisco has + network shaping which
>>
> you
>
>> want extra. So hang out with m0n0 only !!!
>>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>