[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Gary Barclay <badimba at gmail dot com>
 To:  Christian H Borrman <chb at orange dot net>
 Cc:  m0n0Wall <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Re: ADSL Link with DSL-300T modem on WAN IF.
 Date:  Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:09:00 +0100
I'm trying to do the same as Neil was doing with his Origo box.
The DSL-300T supports 'Bridging' when selecting this option all the
configuration paramters normally available are removed from the GUI of
the modem.  This should then allow for the PPP negotiation to be
handled by M0n0wall.  With this configuration, I am unable to get
m0n0wall to establish a PPP link through the modem.  I have tested
that PPPoE works on this particular DSLAM by using a different device
to establish the connection with no problems, furthermore when the
modem is used to establish the connection, it too has no problems.
The problem is that m0n0wall does not seem to be able to use PPPoE
through the modem to establish a connection.  I realise now that I
should have taken a copy of the logs.  I am no longer on site, having
had to revert back to the original config.  I will post the logs as
soon as I get them but in the mean time if there is anything else I
could try or need to be made aware of...please feel free.


On 10/06/05, Christian H Borrman <chb at orange dot net> wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> I am trying to understand what you are trying to do/what the problem is, Are
> you having problems getting a connection on the WAN?
> we have some m0n0s on older dsl-300g which may have the same issues and
> answers.
> Best regards
> Christian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Barclay [mailto:badimba at gmail dot com]
> Sent: 10 June 2005 00:31
> To: m0n0Wall
> Subject: [m0n0wall] Re: ADSL Link with DSL-300T modem on WAN IF.
> Still trying to get this to work.
> Anyone got any suggestions, tricks, advice?
> Doesn't seem to be an unreasonable thing to do but not getting the
> result I want.
> I've read on the web that the dhcp server passes the lan address
> first, then a few minutes later, the wan address.
> Anyone confirm this?
> On 09/06/05, Gary Barclay <badimba at gmail dot com> wrote:
> > Has anyone got this combination working with a m0n0 box?
> > I have trawled through the lists and found mention of a patch that
> > changes the routing to use an int rather than IP?  Has this been
> > implemented into m0n0 or is still required?
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch