[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Holger Bauer" <Holger dot Bauer at citec dash ag dot de>
 To:  "Justin Ellison" <justin at techadvise dot com>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  AW: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall in a small ISP setting
 Date:  Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:37:34 +0200
Hi Justin,

I have a similiar setup in use:

LAN1 (about 200 ports)----[m0n0
bridged+filtered]---LAN2 (about 50 ports)

m0n0s are used to do shaping for highpriority voip (1 voipgateway at each location talking to each
other, 8 channels g711 possible), making midpriority terminalsessions smooth (citrix), and dumping
all the rest to low priority. 
system used have 233MHz cpus and 64 mb RAM. I think a 4801 should handle your bandwidth.


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Justin Ellison [mailto:justin at techadvise dot com]
Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juni 2005 19:03
An: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Betreff: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall in a small ISP setting

Hey guys,

In the real world, I'm the sysadmin for a smaller cable MSO.  We're
getting ready to roll out VOIP to many of our systems, some small, some

We are going to use a large capacity box like a Sandvine PTS for our
larger sites, but at ~$15K/box, that just won't cut it for our smaller

Is anyone using m0n0wall in bridging mode only in an ISP type setting
with 1 or 2 T1's?  I've already got all of the necessary access devices,
I was thinking about putting a m0n0wall with shaping turned on, and
bridging turned on as well.  Simply prioritize my SIP traffic, and bulk
classify the rest.  I'd think a 4801 would handle it?

However, there's no situation like the real world, so I was just
wondering if anyone else has used m0n0 in that type of setup.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch

Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit