|
||||||||
Hi Justin, I have a similiar setup in use: LAN1 (about 200 ports)----[m0n0 bridged+filtered]---[s2m-Router]------(2mbit/2mbit)-----[s2m-Router]---[m0n0 bridged+filtered]---LAN2 (about 50 ports) m0n0s are used to do shaping for highpriority voip (1 voipgateway at each location talking to each other, 8 channels g711 possible), making midpriority terminalsessions smooth (citrix), and dumping all the rest to low priority. system used have 233MHz cpus and 64 mb RAM. I think a 4801 should handle your bandwidth. Regards, Holger -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Justin Ellison [mailto:justin at techadvise dot com] Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juni 2005 19:03 An: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch Betreff: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall in a small ISP setting Hey guys, In the real world, I'm the sysadmin for a smaller cable MSO. We're getting ready to roll out VOIP to many of our systems, some small, some large. We are going to use a large capacity box like a Sandvine PTS for our larger sites, but at ~$15K/box, that just won't cut it for our smaller sites. Is anyone using m0n0wall in bridging mode only in an ISP type setting with 1 or 2 T1's? I've already got all of the necessary access devices, I was thinking about putting a m0n0wall with shaping turned on, and bridging turned on as well. Simply prioritize my SIP traffic, and bulk classify the rest. I'd think a 4801 would handle it? However, there's no situation like the real world, so I was just wondering if anyone else has used m0n0 in that type of setup. Justin -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch ____________ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit |