[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Craig FALCONER <cfalconer at avonside dot school dot nz>
 To:  'Louis' <m0n0 dot ch at hourfollowshour dot org>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Dual Wan Router (XiNCOM)
 Date:  Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:23:06 +1200
Your main problem with this solution is inbound connections.

That router is more of a "home user" product for people who want to use two
connections at the same time, rather than a real business multi-route

Because of this, each WAN connection will have its own IP(s).  Thus incoming
connections will not be load balanced or redundant.  

You need to either get one of these routers on trial, or find someone who
has one.  Most likely the router does NAT, so your m0n0wall box will either
be double NATting, or just routing in the same subnet.  This would make the
DMZ impossible to configure.

-----Original Message-----
From: Louis [mailto:m0n0 dot ch at hourfollowshour dot org] 
Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2005 5:12 a.m.
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: [m0n0wall] Dual Wan Router (XiNCOM)

Anyone currently using a Dual WAN Router from XiNCOM in front of m0n0wall?

I'm would like to use both a DSL and Cable line I have here and it looks 
like this is a nice option to do so.  One key thing I'm not sure of is 
if I can continue to use m0n0 to maintain my multiple WAN IP's/1:1 NAT 
for 4 servers I have in a DMZ that have real IP's each externally.

Appears you can setup multiple WAN IP's using XiNCOM but I imagine then 
my DMZ would be direct off this router and not be handled by m0n0wall 

Any input would be great.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch