|
||||||||||
A dot L dot M dot Buxey at lboro dot ac dot uk wrote: >Hi, > > > >>How can I be sure that the 1400 value for the Mtu will be the good one ? >> >> > >um, because its what you'll need to use to get it to work? ;-) > > That's also my conclusion :) >the Cisco will only do 1500 - but as you are using PPT and/or IPSec, your packets >to and from the PCs are now 1500+padding - 'jumbo' frames. which means that protocols >which cant handle this properly are being fubar'd. The Intel card is quite happy >to shove bigger packets through the network, the via is chomping them to 1500 >automatically so you dont see the problem with that. there are various calculations >that can be done to find optimal MTU size for your deployment, generally its best to make sure >that the number is padded/divisable by 16 > > I have the problem with only Intel ge card :(. The fe via card is working great. I have poor performance without the vlan/interface setup to 1500. So I need to change the mtu on the monowall and Windows station. I also tested that bsd doesn't like to be media forced with a cisco switch (also forced). I have better perf with auto sense on both equipements. >Alan > > Raphaël >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > |