The other day I heard a situation like this described as
"A layer 8 problem"

Quite precise I thought :)



-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel L. Hunter [mailto:dhunter at techmethods dot com] 
Sent: Thursday, 23 June 2005 10:04 a.m.
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] m0n0 IP vs. NAT IP - Solved


My NAT problem is solved.  In fact, the problems had nothing to do with 
NAT.  The ISP was blocking HTTP traffic (even after they said they 
weren't), and the SSH/Telnet servers were running firewalls of their own 
and disallowing traffic originating from outside the network. 

I changed the default port of the website and it worked like a dream.  I 
also tested this with SMTP and RealVNC.  Everything is working as it 
should.  So once again, m0n0wall performed exactly as advertised.  The 
environment and the administrator were the problems.

Thanks for the help,

Danny

********************************************
Daniel L. Hunter
TechMethods, LLC
(p) 304-876-9103
(f) 304-876-9203
http://www.TechMethods.com
dhunter at TechMethods dot com
********************************************



Daniel L. Hunter wrote:

> When you're setting up Server NAT, do you need to use a different IP 
> address than the WAN IP address of the m0n0wall?
>
> For example, can my m0n0wall have WAN IP ***.***.77.6 and then have 
> the Server NAT set to the same IP (***.***.77.6)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Danny
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch