[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Marcelo Webber" <marcewebb at hotmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Traffic Shapper - Weight Queues & Allocation of Bandwith
 Date:  Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:27:35 +0000
Does nobody can help me with this???

>From: "Marcelo Webber" <marcewebb at hotmail dot com>
>To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>Subject: [m0n0wall] Traffic Shapper - Weight Queues & Allocation of 
>Bandwith
>Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:03:12 +0000
>
>Dear friends,
>
>I know this stuff has been discussed, but could not find any post to 
>explain:
>
>When the Low Level Downloading Queue is full of packets, it should have the 
>full bandwith.
>So, if you send home Higher Weight Packet (like PING), the Higher Queue is 
>empty, so asks for some bandwith, and then sends the packet.
>
>Now, because weight IS NOT priorization, sould these packet wait until Low 
>Level Queue is empty?
>Should I send all time PING packets (-t opcion in Win), in order to keep 
>this Higher Queue alive, and preventing Low Level Queur from monopolycing 
>the bandwith?
>
>Oh... poor PING... lost in a "Time Out Exceeded" world... when would some 
>one rescue you???
>
>;o)
>
>Regards,

_________________________________________________________________

http://www.msn.es/Mujer/moda/default.asp