|
||||||||
Does nobody can help me with this??? >From: "Marcelo Webber" <marcewebb at hotmail dot com> >To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >Subject: [m0n0wall] Traffic Shapper - Weight Queues & Allocation of >Bandwith >Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:03:12 +0000 > >Dear friends, > >I know this stuff has been discussed, but could not find any post to >explain: > >When the Low Level Downloading Queue is full of packets, it should have the >full bandwith. >So, if you send home Higher Weight Packet (like PING), the Higher Queue is >empty, so asks for some bandwith, and then sends the packet. > >Now, because weight IS NOT priorization, sould these packet wait until Low >Level Queue is empty? >Should I send all time PING packets (-t opcion in Win), in order to keep >this Higher Queue alive, and preventing Low Level Queur from monopolycing >the bandwith? > >Oh... poor PING... lost in a "Time Out Exceeded" world... when would some >one rescue you??? > >;o) > >Regards, _________________________________________________________________ Moda para esta temporada. Ponte al día de todas las tendencias. http://www.msn.es/Mujer/moda/default.asp |