[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah at acm dot org>
 To:  A dot L dot M dot Buxey at lboro dot ac dot uk
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch, Manuel Kasper <mk at neon1 dot net>, Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>, bmah at acm dot org
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Monowall in the News.
 Date:  Tue, 02 Aug 2005 20:59:12 -0700
If memory serves me right, A dot L dot M dot Buxey at lboro dot ac dot uk wrote:

[Multicast distribution of files.]

> okay. after posting, I realised that its an obvious solution...but so
> ideal that noone is doing it. however, for those folk who are interested
> in such stuff

No, it was done so long ago that people forgot about it.  Google for
"IMM" and "multicast".  One might even find a paper characterizing the
traffic of this and other IP multicast applications, written by a random
grad student at Berkeley about ten years ago.  :-p

In a realistic sense, a larger impediment to multicast distribution of
files is that a lot of Internet users don't have IP multicast

signature.asc (0.2 KB, application/pgp-signature)