Chris Buechler wrote:
>yeah, I don't see something of that nature getting added to m0n0wall.
>What the last poster suggested, when something hits a certain port,
>open up something based on some rules you've predefined, is more sane.
> I don't see that happening either though because of the way it'd have
>to be hacked in to work. Basically it'd be an ugly mess, for
>something that practically nobody wants or needs.
The big advantage of port triggering is that it can work for things like
IRC which require IDENTD and other services that need to be dynamically
As you say though, the implementation...
To the book depository!