[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Seth Martin" <SethM at turbinegenerator dot com>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Died after 4 days
 Date:  Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:27:45 -0400
I put up the beta firmware on a second soekris (we have 2 for testing
new firmwares) and linked them and pounded some data and random other
scripts through it for a weekend, pushing through it about 10x the load
we actually average, and after the weekend was over it was running as
smoothly as when it booted.  That Monday I put it into production and
setup up my network monitoring system to page me if it went down, with
my 1.11 still setup and ready to rock in case of emergency.  I was using
it in production at a branch office though that I was working out of for
the week so I was within 5 minute drive and usually sitting by it 9
hours a day.  I usually am more cautious but I wanted to utilize the
Open VPN functionality because we had a project going on in Chile and
the internet connections down there had trouble working over PPTP.
Cheaper to waste 3 minutes swapping back in the old 4801 with the 1.11
FW than to have 8 guys getting paid over seas rates and not being able
to get the info they need.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Dollmont [mailto:cdollmont at mac dot com] 
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 4:09 PM
To: Robert Staph
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Died after 4 days

Hash: SHA1

I guess I won't be working in your NOC, then. :-)

m0n0wall, as you point out, is a pretty safe beta to run, but I  
wouldn't be silly enough to run beta software without fully testing  
it. To this end, we set up 1.2b9 on a test net and then banged the  
crap out of it for a few days. No problems to report. We then moved  
it over to a production link, and it's been working flawlessly.

It has been my experience that many open source projects tend to be  
overly conservative about the use of the word 'beta'. In my  
development shop, software listed as 'beta' would never be made  
available to the general public--only to a select group of testers. I  
believe that the word 'beta' is used so conservatively as a CYA  
measure. Most open source developers don't have the resources to set  
up a "proper" test environment, so they throw "beta" software out for  
the public to test. I don't think there's anything wrong with that at  
all, but it does cause me to *generally* view beta open source  
software as higher quality and more thoroughly tested than beta  
proprietary software.

Note that, by the way, I'd do exactly the same level of testing with  
a new *production* version of m0n0wall as I'd do with a *beta*  
version. Just because it's not beta, doesn't mean it doesn't need to  
be tested.


On Aug 12, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Robert Staph wrote:

> Some people get away with running beta software in a production  
> environment. I'd have to say that m0n0wall is one of the safer beta  
> software out there in relation to that.  I've got a 1.2b9 thats  
> been up since the day it was out, no issues, but its not on a  
> production level connection.
> But still, if you think beta is perfectly fine for a 100% uptime  
> production environment, I wouldn't want you working in my NOC.
> -Rob

Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.2 (Build 2425)


To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch