[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  <Kamil dot Wencel at hvbpensionsfonds dot de>
 To:  <sonicsai at gmail dot com>, <per at tocodata dot no>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  AW: [m0n0wall] Re: Problem / BUG with Traffic shape?
 Date:  Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:43:52 +0200
what about the real transports pumping via 10000-10005 ( or 10000-20000 for the insane )
defined in rtp.conf ? don't these need prioriazation even more than the SIP connection
and registration handler ? If memory serves me right these ports are the real workhorses.


Von: sai [mailto:sonicsai at gmail dot com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. August 2005 15:38
An: per at tocodata dot no
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Betreff: [m0n0wall] Re: Problem / BUG with Traffic shape?


my suggestion: keep it simple.

keep 2 queues up , 2 queues down

up: 1 queue for voip , the other for everything else
down: 1 queue for voip , the other for everything else
give SIP queues weight 90, other traffic 40
SiP usually uses ports 5060- 5061 , tcp/udp so use this to identify
the sip traffic and put the sip traffic into the voip queues

do not use the masks.

hw much bandwidth do you have?

sai

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch