[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Re: OT: iperf
 Date:  Sat, 27 Aug 2005 10:55:53 -0400
I use it quite a bit and always get predictable, repeatable, sane results.  


On 8/27/05, sai <sonicsai at gmail dot com> wrote:
> hmmm...now today I am getting 80 Mbps, don't think anything changed
> 
> On 8/27/05, Paul Rae <PRae at aminocom dot com> wrote:
> > Are you using different interfaces on the DMZ and WAN?
> >
> >       -----Original Message-----
> >       From: sai [mailto:sonicsai at gmail dot com]
> >       Sent: Sat 27/08/2005 08:23
> >       To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >       Cc:
> >       Subject: [m0n0wall] OT: iperf
> >
> >
> >
> >       Anyone use iperf?
> >
> >       I'm trying to test throughput on a mono system.
> >
> >       I connect PC-a to PC-b with a crossed cable and I get 94 Mbps
> >
> >       PC-a ==== LAN ==== mono ====  DMZ ===== PC-b gets me 93.9 Mbps
> >
> >       but...
> >
> >       PC-a ==== LAN ==== mono ====  WAN ===== PC-b gets me 19.5 Mbps
> >
> >       Is there any reason why the result is so low? What do I need to do to
> >       increase this? The command used is iperf -c PC-b-ip -w 250k
> >
> >       sai
> >
> >       ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >       To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >       For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
>