Manuel Kasper wrote:
>On 28.08.05 19:43 +0100, A dot L dot M dot Buxey at lboro dot ac dot uk wrote:
>>ow. that would be a big reduction in functionality. is this a bug
>>with OpenVPN? now that 2.0 (and onwards) is out, could this have
>No, it has nothing to do with OpenVPN itself, but the way it is
>implemented in m0n0wall. It messes with optional interfaces in ways
>that it shouldn't, and I don't want that in a "production" release...
Any chance you can release a beta version which matches the release, but
includes the OpenVPN functionality?
There are two times when a man doesn't understand a woman
before marriage and after marriage.