|
||||||||||
Manuel Kasper wrote: >On 28.08.05 19:43 +0100, A dot L dot M dot Buxey at lboro dot ac dot uk wrote: > > > >>ow. that would be a big reduction in functionality. is this a bug >>with OpenVPN? now that 2.0 (and onwards) is out, could this have >>been fixed? >> >> > >No, it has nothing to do with OpenVPN itself, but the way it is >implemented in m0n0wall. It messes with optional interfaces in ways >that it shouldn't, and I don't want that in a "production" release... > > Any chance you can release a beta version which matches the release, but includes the OpenVPN functionality? -- There are two times when a man doesn't understand a woman before marriage and after marriage. |