I agree with Dave that having a 1.2+openvpn would be helpful, at least
for all those who are using OpenVPN they would not be stalled on
1.2b9, taht could also include the patch sent a few days ago that
fixed the firewall issues on openvpn interfaces. Later on we can see
on that bug you say. From me, I haven't seen anything strange on
OpenVPN on m0n0 a part from the patch of the firewall rules.

Where's the info on that big bug, just to see if that also happens to
my setup? (I have to m0n0 boxes that connect to one OpenVPN Server,
that lives on a Debian box).

see you!
Marc.


On 8/28/05, Dave Warren <maillist at devilsplayground dot net> wrote:
> Manuel Kasper wrote:
> 
> >On 28.08.05 19:43 +0100, A dot L dot M dot Buxey at lboro dot ac dot uk wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>ow. that would be a big reduction in functionality. is this a bug
> >>with OpenVPN? now that 2.0 (and onwards) is out, could this have
> >>been fixed?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >No, it has nothing to do with OpenVPN itself, but the way it is
> >implemented in m0n0wall. It messes with optional interfaces in ways
> >that it shouldn't, and I don't want that in a "production" release...
> >
> >
> Any chance you can release a beta version which matches the release, but
> includes the OpenVPN functionality?
> 
> 
> --
> There are two times when a man doesn't understand a woman
> before marriage and after marriage.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
>