[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "James McKeand" <james at mckeand dot biz>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] why different images?
 Date:  Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:45:03 -0500
I also believe that the Net45xx, Net48xx, and the WRAP images are
optimized for the differences in processors and IO chipsets used. The
methods for output to the serial consol may also differ.

James W. McKeand

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon SZE-To [mailto:simonchs at gmail dot com] 
Sent: Monday, 29 August 2005 3:09 AM
To: sai
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] why different images?

I think it is because of the different network interface, those images
are pre-assigned network interface, just boot up the board and you can
config in your browser. For the generic-pc image, you may need to plug
the keyboard and monitor to assign interface before use it.

On 8/29/05, sai <sonicsai at gmail dot com> wrote:
> There are a number of images on th edownload pages. I've been using 
> the generic-pc image with a IDE to CF converter.
> I was wondering why the WRAP and Soekris machines have their own 
> images? I would have expected the generic-pc to work on them. What is 
> the difference between these and the generic-pc image?
> sai
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch