I also run my own DNS on an ADSL link and I use a free secondary server:
and I'm pretty happy about it (for that price...)
Vince Van De Coevering wrote:
>>From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuechler at gmail dot com]
>>Overall I'd agree with this, but unless you really, really want to for
>>some reason, I'd avoid using your own DNS servers. You typically get
>>free and solid DNS with domain name registration (and if not, transfer
>>to a registrar that does offer this). Not to mention they'll give you
>>a primary and secondary, and if they do things right they'll be on
>>separate /24 networks, at a minimum, and maybe in two different
>>physical locations. Unless you run a serious NOC yourself, I wouldn't
>>consider hosting your own DNS.
> That may be true for ISPs that provide service in your area
> But my ISP charges a per month per domain fee to host DNS.
> To further their monopoly they refuse to follow the RFC for
> Classless reverse addressing.
> I host my own DNS for just that reason.
> The Private Public DNS server model is another reason to
> Host your own DNS. In that model you set up a DNS server
> That provides zone transfers to the DNS servers defined
> As primary and secondary for your domain. Any change you
> Make will be sent up to these servers. You don't have to
> Worry about configuration inconsistencies between the two
> Servers since they draw their info from the same source.
> I use zones extensively in Bind. I have a zone that provides
> Answers to DNS questions in the safe side of the firewall
> Using LAN addresses and another zone that answers requests
> Using the public IP addresses for requests from the wild
> Side of the firewall.
> I guess it's a matter of preference...
> Vince Van De Coevering
> IT Manager
> Figaro's Italian Pizza, Inc.
> 503-371-9318 x216
> vpv at figaros dot com
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch