[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Quark IT - Hilton Travis" <Hilton at quarkit dot com dot au>
 To:  "Simon SZE-To" <simonchs at gmail dot com>, "sai" <sonicsai at gmail dot com>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] why different images?
 Date:  Fri, 2 Sep 2005 23:20:29 +1000
Hi Simon,

If you manage to plug either a keyboard of a video card into a Soekris
45xx/48xx, please let Soren know how you did it as I'm sure he'd like to
know.  (Soren, the guy who designed these units.)  ;)

--

Regards,

Hilton Travis                          Phone: +61 (0)7 3344 3889
(Brisbane, Australia)                  Phone: +61 (0)419 792 394
Manager, Quark IT                      http://www.quarkit.com.au
         Quark AudioVisual             http://www.quarkav.net

http://www.threatcode.com/ <-- its now time to shame poor coders 
into writing code that is acceptable for use on today's networks

War doesn't determine who is right.  War determines who is left.

This document and any attachments are for the intended recipient 
  only.  It may contain confidential, privileged or copyright 
     material which must not be disclosed or distributed. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon SZE-To [mailto:simonchs at gmail dot com] 
> Sent: Monday, 29 August 2005 18:09
> To: sai
> 
> I think it is because of the different network interface, 
> those images are 
> pre-assigned network interface, just boot up the board and 
> you can config in 
> your browser. For the generic-pc image, you may need to plug 
> the keyboard 
> and monitor to assign interface before use it.
> 
> 
> On 8/29/05, sai <sonicsai at gmail dot com> wrote:
> > 
> > There are a number of images on th edownload pages. I've been using
> > the generic-pc image with a IDE to CF converter.
> > 
> > I was wondering why the WRAP and Soekris machines have their own
> > images? I would have expected the generic-pc to work on 
> them. What is
> > the difference between these and the generic-pc image?
> > 
> > sai