|
||||||||
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:18:43 -0400 Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com> wrote: > > The LAN > > interface is connected to another PC solely to configure m0n0wall. > > with a crossover cable, I presume? No, sorry, there is a mini 5 port hub in the middle. > > Asked another way, "should" m0n0wall 1.2b9 have a WAN IP set up? > > yes Does that mean m0n0wall can't be a "true" transparent firewall? > yeah, I just tested one of my bridged m0n0walls, 1.2b9, nothing on the > LAN interface, and I can ping from m0n0wall to hosts on the bridged > interface as well as hosts on the Internet. I never saw any duplicate > responses either, with numerous tries. I appreciate the effort. Hmm. And I can't remember if I tried pinging when I had 1.11 running. I don't think so because I had to remove the WAN IP from the config file to get bridging to work as I recall (on a suggestion from this list). > You mentioned 10.x.x.x in passing earlier, IIRC, what's the WAN > interface's IP and gateway? Private IP space? If so, what's NAT'ing > it? What is the router in the picture? router - DLink router, with its LAN IP set to 10.0.0.1 WAN - 10.0.0.3, gateway 10.0.0.1 OPT1 - no IP (bridged to WAN) LAN - 192.168.1.2 PCs on OPT1 are 10.0.0.2 and 10.0.0.4+. Traffic from the PCs to the Internet works fine. - Steve Yates - ITS, Inc. - Illiterate? Write for FREE HELP! ~ Taglines by Taglinator 4 - www.srtware.com ~ |