[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Seth Martin" <SethM at turbinegenerator dot com>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] why different images?
 Date:  Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:40:38 -0400
I flash the CF card for my 4801's then insert them and config them with
a serial cable and terminal :-)  There is a PCI slot on the Soekris
boards I don't think it would support a video card, also there is a USB
port on them but I don't think the bios will support a USB keyboard till
an OS initializes the bus and HID device...

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon SZE-To [mailto:simonchs at gmail dot com] 
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:09 AM
To: sai
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] why different images?

I think it is because of the different network interface, those images
pre-assigned network interface, just boot up the board and you can
config in 
your browser. For the generic-pc image, you may need to plug the
and monitor to assign interface before use it.

On 8/29/05, sai <sonicsai at gmail dot com> wrote:
> There are a number of images on th edownload pages. I've been using
> the generic-pc image with a IDE to CF converter.
> I was wondering why the WRAP and Soekris machines have their own
> images? I would have expected the generic-pc to work on them. What is
> the difference between these and the generic-pc image?
> sai
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch