[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  =?iso-8859-1?Q?Carlos_Ros=E1rio?= <carlos dot rosario at netcabo dot pt>
 To:  "'Christoph Hanle'" <christoph dot hanle at leinpfad dot de>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Static Routing?
 Date:  Tue, 6 Sep 2005 19:14:45 +0100
I'm a bit confused.

You said:
"1.Router_xy gets route destinaton 192.168.2.0/24 to 192.168.1.1
- maybe also destinaton 10.10.0.0/30"

But then also said:
"2. mono_A gets changed:
192.168.1.1 to WAN
10.0.0.1 to LAN"

I don't think traffic will ever reach mono_A coming from 192.168.1.0/24, I'm
I wrong?


on freesco, it should work easier for you."

The reason why I'm using m0n0wall is because both WAN's on m0n0_A and m0n0_B
are Wireless Cards.


---



-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Hanle [mailto:christoph dot hanle at leinpfad dot de] 

To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Static Routing?


> No solution?
Not realy

> Site A:
> 
> LAN - 192.168.1.1/24
> 

> 
> The internet gateway for this subnet is at 192.168.1.254 and provides DHCP
> to this subnet.
> 
> Site B:
> 

> 


I this correct?:
0.0.0.0-[Router_xy-192.168.1.254]-LAN_A(192.168.1.0/24)-[192.168.1.1-mono_A-
10.0.0.1]-[10.10.0.2-mono_B-192.168.2.1]-LAN_B(192.168.2.0/24)

If it is so:
1.Router_xy gets route destinaton 192.168.2.0/24 to 192.168.1.1
- maybe also destinaton 10.10.0.0/30
2. mono_A gets changed:
192.168.1.1 to WAN
10.0.0.1 to LAN
route on mono_A 192.168.2.0/32 to mono-B (10.0.0.2), GW on mono_A is 
router-xy
3. mono-B is ok, but route 192.168.1.0/32 to 10.0.0.1 (mono_A)

4. increase 10.0.0.0/30 to 10.0.0.0/24
5. untag "Block private networks" on both monos



on freesco, it should work easier for you.

bye
Christoph


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch