Carlos Rosário schrieb:
> I'm a bit confused.
> 
> You said:
> "1.Router_xy gets route destinaton 192.168.2.0/24 to 192.168.1.1
> - maybe also destinaton 10.10.0.0/30"
oh sorry: destination 10.0.0.0/30 or better 10.0.0.0/24
> 
> But then also said:
> "2. mono_A gets changed:
> 192.168.1.1 to WAN
> 10.0.0.1 to LAN"
> 
> I don't think traffic will ever reach mono_A coming from 192.168.1.0/24, I'm
> I wrong?
> 
> " This should work, but if you don´t need realy firewalling, take a look 
> on freesco, it should work easier for you."
> 
> The reason why I'm using m0n0wall is because both WAN's on m0n0_A and m0n0_B
> are Wireless Cards.
Sorry, but then i can´t help you anymore, for this i need a lab to build 
this, maybe be that bridging is a hint.
bye
christoph
> 
> 
> ---
> Carlos Rosário
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hanle [mailto:christoph dot hanle at leinpfad dot de] 
> Sent: terça-feira, 6 de Setembro de 2005 19:42
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Static Routing?
> 
> Carlos Rosário schrieb:
> 
>>No solution?
> 
> Not realy
> 
> 
>>Site A:
>>
>>LAN - 192.168.1.1/24
>>
>>WAN – 10.0.0.1/30 Gateway:10.0.0.2
>>
>>The internet gateway for this subnet is at 192.168.1.254 and provides DHCP
>>to this subnet.
>>
>>Site B:
>>
>>LAN – 192.168.2.1/24
>>
>>WAN – 10.0.0.2/30  Gateway:10.0.0.1
> 
> 
> I this correct?:
> 0.0.0.0-[Router_xy-192.168.1.254]-LAN_A(192.168.1.0/24)-[192.168.1.1-mono_A-
> 10.0.0.1]-[10.10.0.2-mono_B-192.168.2.1]-LAN_B(192.168.2.0/24)
> 
> If it is so:
> 1.Router_xy gets route destinaton 192.168.2.0/24 to 192.168.1.1
> - maybe also destinaton 10.10.0.0/30
> 2. mono_A gets changed:
> 192.168.1.1 to WAN
> 10.0.0.1 to LAN
> route on mono_A 192.168.2.0/32 to mono-B (10.0.0.2), GW on mono_A is 
> router-xy
> 3. mono-B is ok, but route 192.168.1.0/32 to 10.0.0.1 (mono_A)
> 
> 4. increase 10.0.0.0/30 to 10.0.0.0/24
> 5. untag "Block private networks" on both monos
> 6. i think, but i don´t realy know, then you need 1:1 NAT on both monos.
> 
> This should work, but if you don´t need realy firewalling, take a look 
> on freesco, it should work easier for you.
> 
> bye
> Christoph
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
>