I'm looking for the same solution. 2 X [WAN] into 1 X [M0N0] via 2 cable modems. Load balancing or
failover are not issues.

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:34:29 -0500, Steve Yates wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:07:07 -0400
>
> Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com> wrote:
>
>> That's correct, because you're bridging.  Bridging carries ARP
>> between
>> the interfaces, so you don't need proxy ARP.  If you're routing or
>> NAT'ing, nothing below layer 3 gets past m0n0wall's WAN interface
>> (ARP
>> is L2).  In the case of routing, unless your ISP is specifically
>> routing your public IP subnet to your WAN IP address, you will
>> need
>> proxy ARP.
>>
> Okay (drumming fingers), let me redraw my diagram to make sure I'm
> asking the right question.  :)
>
> [ Internet ]  [ Internet ]
> |               |
> [ router1 ]   [ router2 ]
> |               |
> --------------
> |
> [ m0n0wall WAN = IP from subnet1 ]
> [ m0n0wall OPT1 = bridged to WAN ]
> |
> [ subnet1 or subnet 2 ]
>
> Where router1 = subnet1, router2 = subnet2.  I'm not looking for
> load
> balancing or anything, just thinking through the possibilities of
> using one
> m0n0wall instead of two.
>
> - Steve Yates
> - ITS, Inc.
> - If you only have a nail every tool looks like a hammer.
>
> ~ Taglines by Taglinator - www.srtware.com ~
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch