|
||||||||
Peter Allgeyer wrote: >Hi Kris! > >Am Sonntag, den 18.09.2005, 16:43 -0400 schrieb Kris Maglione: > > >>That's really a good question... I would have no use for it, but I >>suppose it's reasonable for someone to want to route NetBIOS/BEUI or >>IPX, although I can't imagine how well that would fare. >> >> >I see. Routing not routable protocols ;-) > > Just because a protocol is 'not routable' doesn't mean someone won't find a reason run it through a router. Maybe, for instance, someone will decide to hack in a Samba BDC... in that case, though, they could hack in the ethernet tunnel support. Like I said, probably better as a hidden option. Anyway, strictly speaking, they're not 'not routable', it would just be inconvienient to the point of obsurdity to implement it. Sometimes I'll argue a point just for the sake of argument, so I'm done with this one. |