|
||||||||
Hello all, I have a question as to whether anyone has set up routing between m0n0wall devices such that clients on either m0n0wall device can access clients on the other m0n0wall device, with each m0n0wall device having different subnets. My desired configuration is two m0n0wall devices: m0n0wallA LAN: 192.168.2.1 (serves clients 192.168.2.0/24 via DHCP) WAN: 192.168.1.198 m0n0wallB: LAN: 192.168.3.1 (serves clients 192.168.3.0/24 via DHCP) WAN: 192.168.1.197 ClientA: (located under m0n0wallA) 192.168.2.199 ClientB: (located under m0n0wallB) 192.168.3.199 Now, is there any way that Client B can reach Client A, or vice-versa? I tried using static routes in the kernel by adding routes from the m0n0wallA to m0n0wallB's WAN (route add 192.168.3.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.197) with no success. The traceroutes terminate at 192.168.1.197 and don't continue routing down into the subnet 192.168.3.0/24. I tried using proxy ARP and server-NAT to expose the subnets, but by the time the ARPs reach the 192.168.1.1 subnet, ARPs aren't triggered and are sent on their way to the next router specified by "default". Are there any ideas as to what I may be missing or how I can address this issue? Thanks Steven __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |