|
||||||||
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mark Wass <mark dot wass at market dash analyst dot com> >> So like this Chris, is this correct? Yes. It could also be more than just three. Depends on your needs. I think I read where somehwere on this list, someone posted using 6 or 8 interfaces. >> And the IP of the LAN interface on MonoWall1 is 192.68.1.1 /24 Yes >> Will I still be able to access the servers in the DMZ from the Private LAN? Yes and No. The No answer is listed in the documentation and has been asked a hundred times. I don't remember off-hand the reason, except no. However, If you run your own internal secondary DNS, then Yes. While our servers are public to the internet, I have 1:1 NAT setup to each server on DMZ. For LAN clients needing to get to DMZ or LAN servers, I added a Host name in the internal DNS >> Will I still be able to NAT to servers in the Private LAN from the Internet? Yes. >> Will I still be able to NAT to servers in the DMZ from the Internet? Yes. >> Does having 2 MonoWalls setup like in my first picture make anything any more secure? Personally I think it makes thing more complex than need be. Layers always add security. But from what I have read, whether you had 11 or 10 inline firewalls, a hack coming in on port 80 will always get in. It's just as important to make sure the server is secure...in a a "very" small nutshell. - Don |