[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "James W. McKeand" <james at mckeand dot biz>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] secondary cf in m0n0wall
 Date:  Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:16:31 -0500
Quark IT - Hilton Travis wrote:
> And if anyone knew what a "petentation" was, then maybe we could
> explain why wanting one is bad!

Possible misspelling of "penetration"? I assume "better market
penetration" is what the original poster intended...

I believe the consensus is that a firewall (m0n0wall or any other)
should not be Swiss-army-knife network appliance.

James W. McKeand