[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Paul Taylor <PaulTaylor at winn dash dixie dot com>
 To:  "James W. McKeand" <james at mckeand dot biz>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Cc:  bermuller at yahoo dot com
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] secondary cf in m0n0wall
 Date:  Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:02:01 -0400
Since he mentioned adding images and captive portal, I think he meant

If he wants to simply add images to his captive portal page and have them
served off of the Monowall web server, my custom image will do the trick.
It contains lots of new features, including a Captive Portal Element
Manager, where you can upload images, css files, etc. that you want to have
visible from your captive portal login page...  They are all encoded and
saved off as part of your config.xml file.

Generic PC:


Sorry, no embedded platform images yet...  I'm hoping that Manuel will add
some more of our features into the base.. One of the coolest features that
we added (which Manuel has incorporated into beta 10) is the Firewall states
diagnostics page, which lets you see info about active connections in real


-----Original Message-----
From: James W. McKeand [mailto:james at mckeand dot biz] 
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 4:17 PM
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] secondary cf in m0n0wall

Quark IT - Hilton Travis wrote:
> And if anyone knew what a "petentation" was, then maybe we could
> explain why wanting one is bad!

Possible misspelling of "penetration"? I assume "better market
penetration" is what the original poster intended...

I believe the consensus is that a firewall (m0n0wall or any other)
should not be Swiss-army-knife network appliance.

James W. McKeand

To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch