|
||||||||
Chris Buechler wrote: >On 9/29/05, Jason King <jking at informs dot com> wrote: > > >>Does your performance improve when using a m0n0wall installed on a PC >>with a few NIC's in it? Does it improve when you have just a router >>instead of a firewall? I notice that sis0 is autosensing a 10baseT >>connection >> >> > >that's exactly what jumped out at me. half duplex too. What is sis0 >connected to? I'm guessing it's running at a forced 10 Mb full >duplex, and when you plug in m0n0wall, since the other end isn't >autonegotiating, it's sensing 10 Mb and assuming half duplex as any >compliant device will when autoneg is disabled on the other end. > >I'd recommend setting whatever device is on the other side to auto >speed and duplex and that won't be an issue in the future with other >auto devices. > >-Chris > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > Hi guys, Thanks for the responses, it's not the auto-negotiation, at the particular time when I sent the details, I had it plugged into an old hub, the problem occured also when I plugged it straight into my laptop at 100Mb full duplex, I currently have the net4801 running in dhcp mode on the wan interface, connected to my modem/router, and it's working like a dream, which leads me to believe it's the mtu as Paul suggested. I will test again and get back to you guys shortly, cheers Leigh |