[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Phil Carinhas <pac at fortuitous dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] NAT question: redirect all outgoing SMTP to or own SMTP-server
 Date:  Sat, 1 Oct 2005 21:54:30 -0500
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 04:40:49PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On 10/1/05, Phil Carinhas <pac at fortuitous dot com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:41:04PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
> >
> >  Will this work if <target> is in the DMZ network as well?
> 
> Yeah it should, it doesn't really care about the location of the
> destination for that type of rule.
 
Chris,

  I tested this and it works fine. How is this different from
the transparent proxying that has been discussed a la 
http://img.m0n0.ch/docbook/faq-transparentproxy.html ?

 Is this more of a problem when the target (proxy) is on the
same network as the requesting client?

-Phil Carinhas
--
 .--------------------------------------------------------.
 | Dr. Philip A. Carinhas       | pac(at)fortuitous.com   |
 | Fortuitous Technologies Inc. | http://fortuitous.com   |
 | Linux Networking & Security  | Tel : 1-512-351-7783    |
 `--------------------------------------------------------'